Thrasher (Two Photographs and some notes on the resolution of long lenses)

Thrasher-2To view more of my photography please click on www.rakmilphotography.com

I like this little Thrasher perhaps because it was my first sighting of this kind of bird. We saw it from far off and took a few pictures. As we got closer it flew off. Whenever you use a long lens over a great distance, issues arise from air quality, to temperature, to the limits of the lens and sensor resolution that will impact the quality of the photo. To some degree sharpening and noise reduction will help, more the latter than the former. Very long lenses are very inviting but they have their limits (e.g. weight). It is a fact that the closer you are to the subject, regardless of lens, the better quality photograph you will get.

Thrasher

17 responses

  1. simplicity of this picture is so appealing!

    Like

    January 2, 2016 at 3:52 am

  2. Very good captures of the Thrasher! Even with a long lens, you still need good light, unless you are going for the special effects. 🙂

    Like

    January 2, 2016 at 6:38 am

  3. As you know I own an 800mm lens and I wholeheartedly agree with your thoughts. My favourite lens is 400mm – much more versatile. The 800 is great off a tripod in decent light but its not user-friendly to an old un. But it has got me shots I would not otherwise have got. Closer is always better though.

    Like

    January 2, 2016 at 12:47 pm

    • I have seen the 800mm in the field. Very impressive.I am comfortable with the 300 2.8, and will look at the new 200-500mm as it might be a good option.

      Liked by 1 person

      January 2, 2016 at 12:55 pm

      • Who is making that Victor? It sounds interesting.

        Like

        January 2, 2016 at 12:57 pm

        • Nikon, an F5.6 lens going for about $1700. I had a chance to meet someone who has s copy and he is happy with it I read a bit on the quality. Its supposed to be better than the 80-400 that Nikon just released. Too much hype about the 200-500 right now to make a good judgement.

          Liked by 1 person

          January 2, 2016 at 1:00 pm

  4. I recently looked at the new Nikon and am still debating getting a Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens instead, although it is a few hundred more, it has a bit more reach. Highly rated too.

    Like

    January 2, 2016 at 7:58 pm

    • Yes but a variable aperture through the zoom. Makes it complicated.

      Like

      January 2, 2016 at 8:59 pm

      • True, light fall off too. But the price of the Sigma. I tried it out and it seem like a good lens. The 200-500mm Nikon is tempting as well, but like you have not seen enough great reviews yet. I just need a bit more reach for eagles. Not sure it works with a tele-convertor. That may make a difference.

        Like

        January 2, 2016 at 11:18 pm

  5. Tony Sweet (who’s opinion I value) is saying the new 200-599 Nikon lens is terrific. I’m not thrilled with the 5.6 tho. I still love my 70-200 2.8 so will just have to be good at sneaking up on wildlife and birds!! Love shots in the one Victor.

    Like

    January 2, 2016 at 8:29 pm

  6. Happy for you to see and photograph the thrasher! You brought up some interesting thoughts to ponder, reach, weight, aperture. After owning the 80-400 for better than a year and recently adding the 200-500 a couple months ago I find the latter is used mostly because of the constant aperture. We can throw all sorts of money into gear to get “the shot” but more importantly is understanding the behavior of the wildlife we are photographing. Once we have that it’s easier to get close enough to the subject that they are comfortable with our presence.

    Like

    January 3, 2016 at 11:34 am

    • Thanks. I am very interested in finding out more about the handling and image quality of the 200-400. The lens being new there is not a lot of information out there on it.

      Like

      January 3, 2016 at 3:35 pm

  7. What a lucky sighting…they are pretty shy birds!

    Like

    January 3, 2016 at 10:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s