Flycatcher and a Word about Impact (Two Photographs)

fly-catcherTo view more of my photography please click on

In my view the first shot is the better one of the two but what I wanted to point out was why. Simply put the first is the more dynamic of the two, it implies motion and life, and not just a cute bird on a branch.


11 responses

  1. Well said !! I always struggle with trying to explain to people why many of my shots are not cropped as much as most. My only issue is…you explained it in 5 simple words.


    February 10, 2017 at 11:57 am

  2. An interesting distinction, Victor. I agree that the second is a better picture.

    Liked by 1 person

    February 11, 2017 at 7:56 am

  3. Lisa Graaf

    I Think the second one shows more motion and life. It seems that there are different perceptions ……


    February 11, 2017 at 2:20 pm

  4. Nice photos


    February 11, 2017 at 10:18 pm

  5. Viktor thanks for sharing so much with those of us who are still struggling on the path to better photos. 🙂

    Beauty (and preference) is in the eye of the beholder — my eye gravitates to the second photo. For some reason it seems to suggest more interest since the bird is having to turn back further. I also like it because it shows more detail of the beak. Ain’t it an interesting world!


    February 13, 2017 at 3:55 pm

  6. Beautiful pictures! 🙂

    Check out some of my iPhone photos on my blog. Follow if you’d like 🙂


    March 19, 2017 at 8:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.